Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life book. Happy reading Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life Pocket Guide.

After him, people began to admit that life could only come from another life. Curiously enough, however, Pasteur used to say that he had not eliminated completely the possibility of spontaneous generation. Indeed, his experiment could not be applied to the first life form, and the idea that life could come from inorganic matter continued in the agenda among other great scientists.

However, it changed to such a different context from the previous views that it cannot be labeled in the same way. That new kind of "spontaneous generation" would only be valid for the first life form. After that, reproduction would be required. Charles Darwin believed that a puddle of primeval soup, containing ammonia, phosphorus salts, light, heat and electricity could have created proteins that were transformed in more complex compounds, until they originated living organisms.

However, the extension of the evolution to the molecular world as the first chapter of the evolution of life only developed beginning with the ideas of Alexander Ivanovich Oparin As for the place where life was supposed to exist, the Vedas and Upanishads in India believed in the existence of life particles that permeated the entire Universe. During the Renaissance, Giordano Bruno enthusiastically preached the existence of other inhabited worlds. Based on that, the physicist and chemist Savante A. Arrhenius suggested that, besides organic products, life itself had originated in space, being transported here by meteorites.

Not even the advocates of that hypothesis, called panspermia, or those of the competing scenario according to whom life originated on Earth presented solid proofs about where life began. Indeed, that is a secondary problem, compared to other more relevant issues. Throughout the last century, the origin of life began to be approached in a scientific manner, by means of laboratory experiments and the study of theoretical processes.

It became an eminently interdisciplinary theme, involving cosmology, astrophysics, planetology, geology, organic chemistry, molecular biology, mathematics and complex systems theory. In the last fifty years it was subdivided into several subthemes, some of which had remarkable progresses. Nevertheless, some key issues continue without a solution. We do not even have a universally accepted concept of what life is.

Why is a definition as something that is born, grows, reproduces itself and dies not sufficient to characterize life? Simply because several natural phenomena would fit into that definition.

Origins of life

Think about something like a fire or a storm, or even some computer softwares. Such a definition does not help biologists at all and for that reason they do not depend on it. Instead of talking about "life" in a general manner, using the concept of living organism is much more operational. A living organism is based on the cell, in which the genetic information is codified in the DNA deoxyribonucleic acid and expresses itself in the form of proteins. It can be noticed that this concept is modern, having been developed after the invention of the microscope and the discovery of the genetic code.

To reach that point, many modifications took place throughout history, as will be seen later. It is in that specific context that life will be approached in this essay. But in a panorama with so many possibilities, why will we limit ourselves to discuss only the common kind of life that we know? Are there other kinds, here or in other planets? How can we recognize them? The restriction is not because we deny the possibility of the existence of other life paradigms, but because that is the only one that makes a scientific approach possible, because it presents observable data and theoretical models.

Countless attempts to formulate a general concept of life were and are still being made, but none of them presented significant advantages to understand the life we know, nor did it predict the existence of still unknown forms that can be observed. A General Theory of Life has not been developed yet and that limits our capacity to understand it.

Only the discovery of other life specimens independent from the one we know on Earth could lead us to broaden the conceptual horizons. In the final item, we will show projects that aim at discovering life outside the Earth and we will discuss its feasibility and its potential contribution to the understanding of life in the scientific realm. Evolution is the process of change in organisms throughout time, in such a way that those that exist today are different from the initial ones. Although there is a continuity chain throughout time, it is hard to infer the properties of the first organisms based on the current ones.

All the genetic phyla body architectures existent today appeared in the so-called "Cambrian explosion" that occurred around that time. It is characterized by the appearance of the multicellular organisms. In the Pre-Cambrian geological era older than M.

  • Programming Web Services with SOAP.
  • Find a copy online.
  • The Integration Debate: Competing Futures For American Cities.

Fossils of microorganisms were traced back to a past as distant as 3. They are found in rocky aggregates that are still inhabited by bacterial colonies, the so-called stromatolites, 1 such as those from Apex, a formation in Western Australia. They present eleven different kinds of fossils, showing how the cells divided and multiplied themselves although there is some disagreement whether they are real fossils. Their shapes are not distinguishable from the current photosynthetic algae cyanobacteria that infest several environments on Earth.

Even being primitive for current life, those fossils are from organisms so complex that they cannot have been the first life forms. Microbiologists and molecular biologists claim that cyanobacteria were one of the last great bacteria groups to appear. How can we take our studies even further back in time? It is very hard to find rocks that are older than 3. The rocks from the surface are forced to plunge by the plate tectonics, and they are cooked under pressure deep beneath the surface. The older a rock, the rarer it is.

Therefore, there is no hope of finding fossils much older than 3. Biological evolution is a surprising and unexpected fact when we have in mind that the genetic code works to make an exact copy of itself. The double helix structure is an extra guarantee of fidelity, providing two copies of each genetic information.

An Equation for the Origins of Life

If there were only forces that maintain the identity, biological diversity would not exist. However, there are processes that lead to imperfections in reproduction. Those are random "mistakes", natural in any copying process due to environmental radioactivity, cosmic rays coming from space or chemical agents. They generate copy-molecules that are different from the original ones in such a way that, when the molecule participates in the reproduction, the resultant organism will present in general small differences from its ancestor. If it adapts to the environmental conditions, it will survive and might leave descendants, increasing the biological diversity.

There is no trend to produce more complex or more "perfect" organisms, as many people believe. The most complex ones do not seem to be more advantageous from the survival point of view as compared to simpler ones. If that was true, there would be far more complex organisms than simple ones, unlike what can be observed in nature. That idea of evolution as improvement is preached by the creationists, according to whom nature follows an intelligent design.

They apply it not only to the biological evolution, but also to all natural phenomena. It is simply translated in the belief that the natural forces would not be able to create "order" and "beauty" if they were not guided by an intelligence that is external to matter itself. Adopting that point of view means giving science the role of merely finding out what that plan subjacent to nature is, which has already been predetermined forever. Such determinism was abandoned by Quantum Mechanics almost a century ago.

Behind its huge variety of shapes, colors and sizes, the current organisms have very similar characteristics that can be used as important parameters to understand their origin. All organisms have a high percentage of water, which favors the hypothesis that their origin occurred in an aqueous environment. Its atomic composition is also admirably simple. They are among the five most abundant in the Universe, leaving out only helium, which does not form chemical bonds. The biochemistry of life is made up of combinations of those atoms, forming water H 2 O , methane CH 4 , ammonia NH 3 , carbon dioxide CO 2 , sugars, proteins, fatty acids and others.

Although many proteins have metallic elements and require certain ions to operate, the most abundant elements are, by far, the ones mentioned above. The fact that life is made up of the most widely found atoms in nature indicates that it is simply an expression of the opportunity and not an exceptionality, a miracle, that could be done with arbitrary materials, including rare ones.

Although bacteria, whales, palm trees and elephants are so different from one another in shape, chemically speaking they are extremely similar. The nucleotides and aminoacids used by the living organisms are few and almost the same. The joining of those monomers in large chains constitutes the biopolymers: the nucleic acids RNA and DNA and proteins.

They are responsible for the observable biological diversity. In the current living organisms, DNA carries the code to assemble proteins that are responsible for several functions.

Series of steps

Besides the material composition, the form of energy processing metabolism is also very similar in all living organisms, occurring by means of a few intimately related processes. Figure 4 indicates that ALL living organisms are relatives and have a common origin.

What Is the Probability of Life?

A powerful way to diagnose the relationship among the living organisms is through genomic analysis 3 of the 16S ribosomal RNA, which cannot be applied to fossils, since they have lost their cellular content. The ribosomes are molecular complexes within the cells that participate in the production of proteins. Those protein factories are composed of many kinds of ribonucleic acid RNA.

An explanation of what is needed for abiogenesis (or biopoiesis)

Organisms belonging to a biological group that share a recent history have similar RNAr, and the more distant their relationship is, the more they differ. The comparison of 16S RNAr between two groups originated from a common evolutional branch allows us to assess how many changes took place since separation. Therefore, we can build a tree in which the length of the branch is proportional to the number of changes occurred, called the universal phylogenetic tree. One can notice that, although plants and animals are the most familiar forms of life for us, they make up only two of the twenty branches of the tree of life.

Besides those two, only fungi have members observable without a microscope. Most of life is invisible to the naked eye. All known organisms belong to one of the three domains: B acteria or Eubacteria , Archaea or Archaebacteria and E ukarya or Eukaryotes. All branches connect to a single one in a region somewhere between Bacteria and Archea.

  • The Origin of Life and the Death of Materialism: Meyer, Stephen C.!
  • Radiogenic Isotopes in Geologic Processes!
  • Spirits Rebellious.